Home > Error Cannot > Error Cannot Represent Relocation Type Bfd_reloc_x86_64_32s

Error Cannot Represent Relocation Type Bfd_reloc_x86_64_32s

Contents

The Debian FAQ explains the different versions, but who reads it? ;-) To contrast, in both Fedora and Ubuntu, the default download is the image for 64-bit PCs. … -- Nadav c++ linux gcc assembly share|improve this question edited May 20 '14 at 21:43 Maxpm 7,1151163126 asked May 20 '14 at 21:33 AlainM 11 2 That's some damn heavy code. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo [at] vger More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ Fungerar inga Tweets för dig? weblink

Terms Privacy Security Status Help You can't perform that action at this time. Where did you get this code? I'm surprised the Debian installation page doesn't make more obvious what the different images are. Registrera dig Har du ett konto? http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/596722

Error Cannot Represent Relocation Type Bfd_reloc_x86_64_32s

Ta reda på vad som händer Läs de senaste konversationerna om valfritt ämne på en gång. Ken -- das eine Mal als Tragdie, das andere Mal als Farce rlrevell at joe-job Dec9,2005,1:35PM Post #13 of 36 (4342 views) Permalink Re: i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?) [In I've done it without all that making a separate > binutils non-sense. The 64-bit environment sets int to 32 bits and long and pointer to 64 bits and generates code for AMD's x86-64 architecture.

asked 2 years ago viewed 208 times active 2 years ago Related 198How do you get assembler output from C/C++ source in gcc?0compiling 64 bit linux kernel with gcc12Running 32 bit I've done it without all that making a separate binutils non-sense. I know this is a major hack, but I don't have time to pretty this up! -- Steve - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the Lee Previous message: [linux-audio-dev] Cross compiling the kernel Next message: [linux-audio-dev] Cross compiling the kernel Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] More

Or is the plan to run an osv machine inside a debian machine inside a Mac just too weird to deal with? These are the ones I have: amd64-libs amd64-libs-dev lib64gcc1 lib64gfortran0 lib64ncurses5 lib64ncurses5-dev lib64objc1 lib64stdc++6 lib64stdc++6-4.0-dbg lib64z1 lib64z1-dev libc6-amd64 libc6-dev-amd64 Yes... The > 64-bit environment sets int to 32 bits and long > and pointer to 64 bits and generates code for AMD's x86-64 > architecture. > > Lee > Yes, file More Bonuses Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak [at] suse> Index: linux/arch/x86_64/Makefile =================================================================== --- linux.orig/arch/x86_64/Makefile +++ linux/arch/x86_64/Makefile @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ cflags-$(CONFIG_MK8) += $(call cc-option cflags-$(CONFIG_MPSC) += $(call cc-option,-march=nocona) CFLAGS += $(cflags-y) +CFLAGS += -m64

I didn't realize when it says "AS foo.o" it really means it's running CC, not AS. (I had also built a cross compiling gcc, but didn't realize it was being used). I disabled CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION and it works perfectly. Already have an account? But the build fails > >>>with: > >>> > >>>$ make ARCH=x86_64 > >>> [...] > >>> CC init/initramfs.o > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>I have successfully

It stores the address of 0:, in other words the address of the int3 instruction. Perhaps if you ask on the > > > debian-amd64 some kind soul has unofficial packages you can use. > > > > Try here: > > http://debian.speedblue.org/ > > > Error Cannot Represent Relocation Type Bfd_reloc_x86_64_32s What is the difference between "count proportions" and "continuous proportions"? But the build fails > with: > > $ make ARCH=x86_64 > [...] > CC init/initramfs.o > CC init/calibrate.o > LD init/built-in.o > CHK usr/initramfs_list > CC arch/x86_64/kernel/process.o > CC arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.o

Säg mycket med små medel Om du ser en Tweet som du blir stormförtjust i kan du trycka på hjärtat, så får användaren som skrev den veta att du gillade den. have a peek at these guys A working solution is to use RIP relative addressing. The > > 64-bit environment sets int to 32 bits and long > > and pointer to 64 bits and generates code for AMD's x86-64 > > architecture. > > > I added -m64 to the CFLAGS as per the gcc docs.

Only the very early x86-64 distributions set up the gccs like this until it was noticed that a gcc compiled for 64bit targets run noticeable slower on 32bit and needs more Building binutils for target x86_64-pc-linux-gnu should help. > I thought that might be the problem so I installed an x86-64 binutils from: http://debian.speedblue.org I tried with CROSS_COMPILE="/usr/x86_64/bin/x86_64-linux-", but edited the Makefile Work more with Ubuntu and CentOS. check over here Then I built glibc, and then once again the gcc with: ../gcc-4.0.2/configure --prefix=/usr/local/x86_64 --target=x86_64-linux \ --enable-shared --with-headers=/usr/local/x86_64/include \ --with-libs=/usr/local/x86_64/lib --disable-multilib \ --enable-languages=c Probably not the best way, but it worked for

That's because it does everything with long long internally then and gcc's code generation for long long is not exactly great. OSv needs a bunch of Debian packages to be installed (besides the obvious stuff like C compiler, it also needs some less obvious things like ant, qemu-img, etc. Här visas den senaste informationen om det du tycker är viktigt.

Ubuntu seems didn't pay attention to history and just repated that mistake.

hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site  i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?) From: Lee Revell Date: Fri Dec 09 2005 - 13:49:44 EST Next message: Andi Kleen: "Re: So it's normally better to use a separate cross compiler for 64bit to keep the 32bit compilations running faster. I apologize in advance if it is. Försök igen.

But the build failswith:$ make ARCH=x86_64 [...] CC init/initramfs.o CC init/calibrate.o LD init/built-in.o CHK usr/initramfs_list CC arch/x86_64/kernel/process.o CC arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.o AS arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.oarch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S: Assembler messages:arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S:204: Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_X86_64_32Sarch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S:275: Error: cannot thats about par for the course. Building binutils for target x86_64-pc-linux-gnu should help. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo [at] vger More majordomo info this content But the build fails > >>>with: > >>> > >>>$ make ARCH=x86_64 > >>> [...] > >>> CC init/initramfs.o > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>I have successfully

Reload to refresh your session. Heathrow to Gatwick and traffic jam How can I have low-level 5e necromancer NPCs controlling many, many undead in this converted adventure? But the build fails with: $ make ARCH=x86_64 [...] CC init/initramfs.o CC init/calibrate.o LD init/built-in.o CHK usr/initramfs_list CC arch/x86_64/kernel/process.o CC arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.o AS arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.o arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S: Assembler messages: arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S:204: Error: cannot represent relocation Take a look at the gas command line being issued by gcc when you are compiling application.c.

Sign in to comment Contact GitHub API Training Shop Blog About © 2016 GitHub, Inc. fi __MY_MAKE_RUNNING__=1 export __MY_MAKE_RUNNING__ pwd=`pwd | sed -ne '/\/home\/rostedt\/work\/kernels\//p'` if [ -z $pwd ]; then m="intmake" else m="amdmake" fi # prove to me that I'm running the right one echo $m I don't want to waste anyone's time, but if there is a simple fix, or if this is ill advised in the first place, let me know. If I jsut add -m64 to everything then it fails when it gets to the ia32 stuff.

Inkludera den överordnade tweeten Inkludera media Förhandsgranskning Stäng Logga in på Twitter Kom ihåg mig · Glömt lösenordet? Then it would be possible to download the sources and scan through and understand what it does. Adding -m64 to CFLAGS/AFLAGS on a native > > 64bit biarch toolchain and it compiled without problems. Login | Register For Free | Help Search this list this category for: (Advanced) Mailing List Archive: Linux: Kernel i386 -> x86_64 cross compile failure (binutils bug?) 1

I compiled from source using: ~/Downloads/binutils-2.24/configure --disable-werror make ~/Downloads/binutils-2.24/gas/configure make sudo make install Assembled and linked with as -o write64bit.o write64bit.s ld -lSystem -macosx_version_min 10.10 -o write64bit write64bit.o write64bit.s source code What is it for? –Maxpm May 20 '14 at 21:44 add a comment| 1 Answer 1 active oldest votes up vote 2 down vote 1) Obviously, it's hard to tell exactly Tillbaka Nästa Nästa Tweet från användaren Föregående tweet Nästa tweet Följ Följer Avfölj Blockerad Häv blockering Pågående Avbryt 水の味 ‏@konyavic 28 juni 2014 Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_X86_64_32S 23:03 -